<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robotics Blog &#187; news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roboticsblog.org/tag/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roboticsblog.org</link>
	<description>Robot and Electronics News Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Like us on Facebook! Robotics Blog has a Facebook page!</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2010/robot-news/like-us-on-facebook-robotics-blog-has-a-facebook-page/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2010/robot-news/like-us-on-facebook-robotics-blog-has-a-facebook-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[robot news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roboticsblog.org/?p=1267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check us out on Facebook! No one likes us yet &#8230; You can be the&#160;first!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong><a href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2JpdC5seS9kcWJXd0Y=">Check us out on Facebook! </a> No one likes us yet <img src='http://roboticsblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230; You can be the&nbsp;first!</strong></h3>
 <img src="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1267" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2010/robot-news/like-us-on-facebook-robotics-blog-has-a-facebook-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robot Surgery Is Safe, But No Better Than Regular Surgery for Children, Says Report.</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/robot-news/robot-surgery-is-safe-but-no-better-than-regular-surgery-for-children-says-report/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/robot-news/robot-surgery-is-safe-but-no-better-than-regular-surgery-for-children-says-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[da vinci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robotic surgery system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roboticsblog.org/?p=1053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a study published in Pediatrics, using robots for surgery is safe, but provides no better outcomes for child patients in some cases. Robotic surgery systems, such as the Da Vinci allow surgeons to more easily do less invasive surgeries, as well as reduce human error like shaking hands.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/robot-news/robot-surgery-is-safe-but-no-better-than-regular-surgery-for-children-says-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spirit Rover Snaps Pictures of Her Undercarriage</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-snaps-pictures-of-her-undercarriage/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-snaps-pictures-of-her-undercarriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space and NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuck in sand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roboticsblog.org/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having been embedded in a rut of floury sand for several weeks now, NASA's Mars Rover has successfully used its microscopic imager to shoot a collage of her underbelly. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been embedded in a rut of floury sand for several weeks now, NASA&#8217;s Mars Rover has successfully used its microscopic imager to shoot a collage of her&nbsp;underbelly. </p>
<p>The tilted image below shows the rover&#8217;s dire condition. Sloped at a roughly 20Â¨ angle, Spirit&#8217;s wheels are deeply entrenched in the sand. Luckily, Spirit&#8217;s chassis appears to be free from major obstructions, giving some hope to crews working out a rescue&nbsp;plan.</p>
<div id="attachment_785" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3JvYm90aWNzYmxvZy5vcmcvd3AtY29udGVudC91cGxvYWRzLzIwMDkvMDYvbWFycy1zcGlyaXQtcm92ZXItdW5kZXJiZWxseS1waG90by5qcGc="><img src="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/mars-spirit-rover-underbelly-photo.jpg" alt="Spirit&#039;s undercarriage as photographed by the rover&#039;s microscopic imaging camera. The blurriness results from the camera&#039;s focal length of 6cm. Image: NASA" title="mars-spirit-rover-underbelly-photo" width="500" height="233" class="size-medium wp-image-785" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Spirit's undercarriage as photographed by the rover's microscopic imaging camera. The blurriness results from the camera's focal length of 6cm. Image:&nbsp;NASA</p></div>
<p>Engineers at NASA&#8217;s Jet Propulsion Lab are studying the images to develop a plan that will free the ailing rover. This isn&#8217;t the first time a mars rover has become stuck. In 2005, Spirit&#8217;s twin rover, Opportunity, became disabled by the sand. Opportunity&#8217;s foray with powdery martian sand resulted in a month of downtime before slow forward progress inched her into the&nbsp;clear. </p>
<p>Another tactic for removing sand imprisoned mars rovers is to back up the rover out of the martian sand trap on the same path it went in. It is unlikely, however, that engineers will reverse Spirit out of the sand trap. In 2006, Spirit&#8217;s front right wheel permanently jammed. Since then, Spirit has operated in reverse, dragging her jammed wheel&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;making backing up out of her sandy tomb a difficult&nbsp;task. </p>
<div id="attachment_791" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 307px"><a href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3JvYm90aWNzYmxvZy5vcmcvd3AtY29udGVudC91cGxvYWRzLzIwMDkvMDYvb3Bwb3J0dW5pdHktbWFycy1yb3Zlci1zdHVjay0yMDA1LmpwZw=="><img src="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/opportunity-mars-rover-stuck-2005-297x300.jpg" alt="Opportunity, Spirit&#039;s twin mars rover, is shown here making slow progress while stuck in 2005. Image: NASA" title="opportunity-mars-rover-stuck-2005" width="297" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-791" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Opportunity, Spirit's twin mars rover, is shown here making slow progress while stuck in 2005. Image:&nbsp;NASA</p></div>
<p>This news comes after a rough year for the rover. Last year, budget concerns resulted in an attempt to shut down the rover project as we know it. Recently, Spirit underwent a bout of amnesia, and could not report what it had recently done. Engineers were also worried about a possible lock-up in one of Spirit&#8217;s middle wheels, which a reassuring roll test suggested no problem existed. One can only be thankful that the rovers have lasted almost 1900 days past their 90 day planned&nbsp;mission.</p>
<p>Be sure to <a href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3JvYm90aWNzYmxvZy5vcmcvZmVlZC8=">Subscribe to the RSS Feed</a> so we can keep you&nbsp;updated.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL21hcnNyb3Zlci5uYXNhLmdvdi9nYWxsZXJ5L3ByZXNzL3NwaXJpdC8yMDA5MDYwM2EuaHRtbA==">June 3 Press&nbsp;Release</a>]</p>
 <img src="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=783" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-snaps-pictures-of-her-undercarriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spirit Rover Update &#8211; Stuck Mars Rover</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-update-stuck-mars-rover/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-update-stuck-mars-rover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space and NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrobotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuck in sand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roboticsblog.org/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NASA is currently planning on imaging the underbody of the immobile rover to see just how badly Spirit is trapped in the sand.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-update-stuck-mars-rover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spirit Rover Update &#8211; Still Stuck, But NASA is Working on it.</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-update-still-stuck-but-nasa-is-working-on-it/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-update-still-stuck-but-nasa-is-working-on-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space and NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrobotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roboticsblog.org/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stuck Spirit Mars Rover receives good news about her middle wheel. Diagnostics indicate it may not be jammed after all. Opportunity snaps a picture of herself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/spirit-rover-update-still-stuck-but-nasa-is-working-on-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satellite Collision a US Military Test? Says Who!</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/satellite-collision-a-us-military-test-says-who/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/satellite-collision-a-us-military-test-says-who/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space and NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DARPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roboticsblog.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A retired Russian General has claimed the &#8216;accidental crash&#8217; between a Russian and US Iridium communications satellite was no accident. According to Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Leonid Shershnev, former head of Russian military space intelligence, the crash may really be a conspiracy&#8201;&#8211;&#8201;a US ploy to test the feasibility of controlling or disabling hostile satellites.Â  Source: Official [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><img title="Orbital Express Satellite" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/Orbital_Express_1.jpg" alt="Orbital Express Satellite" width="288" height="216" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Orbital Express&nbsp;Satellite</p></div>
<p>A retired Russian General has claimed the &#8216;accidental crash&#8217; between a Russian and US Iridium communications satellite was no accident. According to  Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Leonid Shershnev, former head of Russian military space intelligence, the crash may really be a conspiracy&thinsp;&#8211;&thinsp;a US ploy to test the feasibility of controlling or disabling hostile satellites.Â  Source:<a title=\"Russian State-Owned News Agency\" href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2VuLnJpYW4ucnUvcnVzc2lhLzIwMDkwMzAzLzEyMDM5MjQ5MC1wcmludC5odG1s" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow\"> Official Russian State-ownedÂ  NewsÂ  and Information&nbsp;Agency&thinsp;&#8211;&thinsp;RIAN</a></p>
<p>You may have heard about this supposed &#8220;test&#8221; already (Above at RIAN,  <a title=\"Robots.net\" href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3JvYm90cy5uZXQvYXJ0aWNsZS8yNzc0Lmh0bWw=" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE </a>on robots.net, and many other places on the &#8216;net I&#8217;m too lazy to link to). If not, you&#8217;ve probably at least heard that two satellites collided, leaving a ton of dangerous&nbsp;debris.</p>
<p>Does anyone else question the credibility of a Russian General (ret.) talking about a US conspiracy to take out foreign satellites in the State-owned Russian news agency? If you don&#8217;t, you probably should. This sounds like nothing but Russian propaganda, to me. For the hearing impared, it smells and looks like it,&nbsp;too.</p>
<p>Sure, a loosely related <a title=\"Orbital Express -Wikipedia.org\" href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9PcmJpdGFsX0V4cHJlc3M=" rel=\"nofollow\">DARPA program</a> may have existed, but let&#8217;s not take their state-owned word for it when they say the program&#8217;s purpose was to go out and destroy other&nbsp;satellites.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d probably never know for sure if it really was a secret US Military test. Remember,Â  just because the odds were long doesn&#8217;t make it impossible. It makes it unlikely. Sometimes unlikely things&nbsp;happen.</p>
<p>You may also like reading about: <a title=\"Kessler Syndrome -Wikipedia.org\" href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9LZXNzbGVyX1N5bmRyb21l" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Kessler&nbsp;Syndrome</a></p>
 <img src="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=12" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/satellite-collision-a-us-military-test-says-who/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

