<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robotics Blog &#187; DARPA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roboticsblog.org/tag/darpa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roboticsblog.org</link>
	<description>Robot and Electronics News Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Programmable Matter Could Create Shape Shifting Robots</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/robotics-research/programmable-matter-could-create-shape-shifting-robots/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/robotics-research/programmable-matter-could-create-shape-shifting-robots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DARPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futuristic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programmable matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape shifting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roboticsblog.org/?p=816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Programmable matter could be used to create shape-shifting robots capable of changing their shape and adapting to their environment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/robotics-research/programmable-matter-could-create-shape-shifting-robots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ember Military &#8216;LANdroid&#8217; Robot Video Update</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/military-robots/ember-military-landroid-robot-video-update/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/military-robots/ember-military-landroid-robot-video-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad-hoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autonomous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DARPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ember]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irobot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roboticsblog.org/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Ember', is their book-sized autonomous robot made for the LANdroid program.Ember's ad-hoc network maintains communication between soldiers on the battlefield.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/military-robots/ember-military-landroid-robot-video-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iRobot&#8217;s Tiny &#8216;Ember&#8217; Bot Creates an Ad-Hoc Network for Soldiers.</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/military-robots/irobots-tiny-ember-bot-creates-an-ad-hoc-network-for-soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/military-robots/irobots-tiny-ember-bot-creates-an-ad-hoc-network-for-soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad-hoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autonomous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DARPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ember]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irobot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small robot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roboticsblog.org/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of Ember's duties is to keep soldiers in communication. In urban environments, buildings and angle of incidents between wireless devices can greatly affect signal propegation. LANdroids are tasked with autonomously seeking a position that keeps the network alive, while still maintaining other missions objectives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/military-robots/irobots-tiny-ember-bot-creates-an-ad-hoc-network-for-soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satellite Collision a US Military Test? Says Who!</title>
		<link>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/satellite-collision-a-us-military-test-says-who/</link>
		<comments>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/satellite-collision-a-us-military-test-says-who/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space and NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DARPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roboticsblog.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A retired Russian General has claimed the &#8216;accidental crash&#8217; between a Russian and US Iridium communications satellite was no accident. According to Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Leonid Shershnev, former head of Russian military space intelligence, the crash may really be a conspiracy&#8201;&#8211;&#8201;a US ploy to test the feasibility of controlling or disabling hostile satellites.Â  Source: Official [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><img title="Orbital Express Satellite" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/Orbital_Express_1.jpg" alt="Orbital Express Satellite" width="288" height="216" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Orbital Express&nbsp;Satellite</p></div>
<p>A retired Russian General has claimed the &#8216;accidental crash&#8217; between a Russian and US Iridium communications satellite was no accident. According to  Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Leonid Shershnev, former head of Russian military space intelligence, the crash may really be a conspiracy&thinsp;&#8211;&thinsp;a US ploy to test the feasibility of controlling or disabling hostile satellites.Â  Source:<a title=\"Russian State-Owned News Agency\" href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2VuLnJpYW4ucnUvcnVzc2lhLzIwMDkwMzAzLzEyMDM5MjQ5MC1wcmludC5odG1s" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow\"> Official Russian State-ownedÂ  NewsÂ  and Information&nbsp;Agency&thinsp;&#8211;&thinsp;RIAN</a></p>
<p>You may have heard about this supposed &#8220;test&#8221; already (Above at RIAN,  <a title=\"Robots.net\" href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3JvYm90cy5uZXQvYXJ0aWNsZS8yNzc0Lmh0bWw=" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE </a>on robots.net, and many other places on the &#8216;net I&#8217;m too lazy to link to). If not, you&#8217;ve probably at least heard that two satellites collided, leaving a ton of dangerous&nbsp;debris.</p>
<p>Does anyone else question the credibility of a Russian General (ret.) talking about a US conspiracy to take out foreign satellites in the State-owned Russian news agency? If you don&#8217;t, you probably should. This sounds like nothing but Russian propaganda, to me. For the hearing impared, it smells and looks like it,&nbsp;too.</p>
<p>Sure, a loosely related <a title=\"Orbital Express -Wikipedia.org\" href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9PcmJpdGFsX0V4cHJlc3M=" rel=\"nofollow\">DARPA program</a> may have existed, but let&#8217;s not take their state-owned word for it when they say the program&#8217;s purpose was to go out and destroy other&nbsp;satellites.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d probably never know for sure if it really was a secret US Military test. Remember,Â  just because the odds were long doesn&#8217;t make it impossible. It makes it unlikely. Sometimes unlikely things&nbsp;happen.</p>
<p>You may also like reading about: <a title=\"Kessler Syndrome -Wikipedia.org\" href="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9LZXNzbGVyX1N5bmRyb21l" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Kessler&nbsp;Syndrome</a></p>
 <img src="http://roboticsblog.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=12" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roboticsblog.org/2009/space-nasa-robots/satellite-collision-a-us-military-test-says-who/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
